Karl Marx
Tier SForemost of this book's intellectual sources1818–1883
Karl Marx (full name Karl Heinrich Marx) was born on 5 May 1818 in Trier, in the Rhine Province of Prussia, into a Jewish family of lawyers shaped by Enlightenment thought and the French Revolution. Showing an early interest in literature and philosophy, he studied at the Universities of Bonn and Berlin, first law and then philosophy and history, and in 1841 received a doctorate in philosophy from the University of Jena for a dissertation on the difference between the natural philosophies of Democritus and Epicurus. He married Jenny von Westphalen in 1843 and later lived long stretches in Paris, Brussels, and London, witnessing firsthand the social changes of post-industrial Europe. His life's work concentrated on the critical analysis of capitalist society and, on that basis, the construction of the theoretical system of scientific socialism, always joined to the actual movement of the working class. Spinning across philosophy, economics, and politics, his writings form what came to be called Marxism. The Selected Works of Mao Zedong takes Marxism as its methodological ground, repeatedly citing the Communist Manifesto, the Preface to A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy, and Capital as the theoretical point of departure for analysing China's social character, class structure, and revolutionary path; the 'Marxism-Leninism' the book invokes rests on his and Lenin's doctrines as its two pillars.
- With Engels he co-authored the Communist Manifesto (1848), opening with 'The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles.'
- Capital exposes the inner contradictions of the capitalist mode of production and lays the foundation of the theory of surplus value.
- This book uses his paired categories of 'productive forces and relations of production' and 'economic base and superstructure' to analyse China.
Family and origins
Marx was born in May 1818 in Trier, Rhine Province, Prussia, into a Jewish family of lawyers shaped by Enlightenment thought; his father was a local lawyer and his mother came from a Dutch-Jewish family. The strongly enlightened, humanistic atmosphere at home gave him the habit of independent thought from childhood. He attended the Trier Gymnasium and then the Universities of Bonn and Berlin, studying law and philosophy and gradually drawn to Hegel's dialectics. At Berlin he joined the Young Hegelian 'Doctors' Club', coming under the influence of Bauer and others and beginning to intervene in reality through philosophical criticism. In 1841 he received a doctorate in philosophy from the University of Jena for a dissertation on the difference between the natural philosophies of Democritus and Epicurus — a work marking his turn from pure philosophy toward concern for actual society and the start of his scholarly and public writing. Trier's position at the crossroads of Germany and France, where Enlightenment and revolutionary currents met, deeply shaped his worldview; his Jewish background left him somewhat marginal in Prussian society of the time.
Youth and education
In 1842 he edited the Rheinische Zeitung, confronting Prussian social contradictions and press censorship and first showing a tendency to engage reality through the pen. In Paris he encountered French socialism and English political economy and, in the Deutsch-Französische Jahrbücher, published 'On the Jewish Question' and 'Critique of Hegel's Philosophy of Right: Introduction', completing his worldview shift from idealism to materialism and from revolutionary democracy to communism. In 1844 he met Engels in Paris and the two became lifelong collaborators, jointly laying the theoretical and organizational foundation. During this period he also studied British classical political economy and French utopian socialism, accumulating material for his later theoretical synthesis; this worldview shift became the cornerstone of all his subsequent theoretical work, and his passage 'from the study to the square' gave his theory an enduringly practical orientation.
Entering the cause
Expelled from France by the Prussian government in 1845, he moved to Brussels, where with Engels he co-wrote The Holy Family and The German Ideology, systematically expounding the basic propositions of historical materialism and marking it off from various idealist conceptions of history. In 1847 he joined the League of the Just and reorganized it into the Communist League, commissioned to draft its programme. In February 1848 the Communist Manifesto was published in London, opening with 'The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles' and marking the public arrival of scientific socialism, rapidly becoming the programmatic document of the workers' movement and turning socialism from utopia into science. After its publication the Manifesto was quickly translated into many languages, becoming the most rousing programmatic text of the nineteenth-century workers' movement. That year he returned to Germany to throw himself into revolutionary practice, joining theory and real politics directly for the first time.
Main career
When the 1848 European revolutions erupted, he returned to Germany to found the Neue Rheinische Zeitung, taking direct part in revolutionary propaganda and organization; after its failure he went into exile in London, where he settled for the rest of his life. For decades thereafter he devoted his main energies to writing Capital, exposing the inner contradictions of the capitalist mode of production and the theory of surplus value to provide the workers' movement with a theoretical basis. He also helped found the International Workingmen's Association, promoting the unity of proletarian organizations across countries, and defended the organization's unity in debates against Proudhon, Bakunin, and others, maintaining close contact with workers' organizations abroad even in exile. The three-volume plan of Capital was so vast that it remained unfinished at his death, a measure of the enormity of the system. The 'Marxism-Leninism' this book speaks of rests on his and Lenin's theories as its two pillars, and its categories of 'productive forces and relations of production' and 'economic base and superstructure' are used throughout to analyse China.
Legacy
Marx's doctrine spread across continental Europe and Russia in the late nineteenth century and in the twentieth became the guiding ideology and basis of state-building for many communist parties, spawning different interpretive schools. This book repeatedly calls his doctrine 'universally applicable', while stressing that it must be combined with each country's concrete practice and opposing its dogmatic application. His writings on class struggle, the dictatorship of the proletariat, and the theory of the state are an important theoretical resource for this book's observation and analysis of the Chinese revolution. After his death his theoretical legacy was carried forward and practiced by Engels and later Marxists; its influence reached far beyond academia into twentieth-century world politics, and within the international communist movement multiple lines and schools formed around how to interpret and practice his doctrine.
Personal life
Marx lived long in London, reading and writing daily in the British Museum reading room. Repeatedly straitened for money, he was able to sustain his research only thanks to Engels's long-term support. He wrote prodigiously despite frail health, kept following the actual development of the international workers' movement in his later years, and left a large body of unsorted manuscripts. His marriage to Jenny weathered decades of hardship; though the family was poor, their bond was deep, and his attention to his children's education shows in his later letters home. Wide-ranging in interests — literature, history, mathematics — the breadth of his thought surfaces throughout his letters and notes. He died in London in March 1883 and was buried in Highgate Cemetery; his manuscripts and unfinished work were continued and completed by Engels.
Friedrich Engels
Tier AOne of this book's intellectual sources1820–1895
Friedrich Engels was born on 28 November 1820 in Barmen (today Wuppertal), Rhine Province, Prussia, into a textile-manufacturer's family. Forced into commerce young, he nevertheless kept his attention on workers' conditions and philosophical currents, and ultimately co-founded scientific socialism with Marx. His Anti-Dühring and Dialectics of Nature, and the Communist Manifesto co-authored with Marx, are all sources for this book; the Selected Works of Mao Zedong often follows his materialist-dialectical framework when discussing philosophy and methodology. Combining the roles of industrialist and theorist, he long supported Marx with the proceeds of business and, after Marx's death, saw the later volumes of Capital through the press; his popular expositions also made Marxism more accessible to the general public.
- With Marx he co-authored the Communist Manifesto, establishing the basic propositions of class struggle and the historical mission of the proletariat.
- Anti-Dühring systematically expounds philosophy, political economy, and scientific socialism and is regarded as an encyclopedia of Marxism.
- After Marx's death he edited and published Volumes II and III of Capital, preserving the theoretical system.
Family and origins
Engels was born in 1820 in Barmen, Germany, into a wealthy textile-manufacturer's family. As a youth he was sent into commerce and worked in factories in Bremen and Manchester. During his Manchester years in business he came into close contact with British industrial workers and observed firsthand the operation of the factory system and workers' poverty. This experience became the empirical basis of his later The Condition of the Working Class in England; his early commercial experience also gave him a close-up view of capitalist production, unlike a purely book-bound scholar.
Youth and education
In 1844 he met Marx again in Paris — the two had already exchanged letters via the Deutsch-Französische Jahrbücher — and thereafter converged in philosophical and political stance, laying the foundation of a lifelong collaboration. He moved from Young Hegelianism to communism and began a systematic study of English political economy and French socialist thought. His early writings already showed a tendency to join philosophical criticism with the workers' movement; he also translated Marx's early writings, helping disseminate them in the German-speaking world.
Entering the cause
In 1845 he published The Condition of the Working Class in England, bringing empirical study of the industrial proletariat into theory-building and laying a foundation for early workers'-movement research. Thereafter, with Marx, he co-wrote The Holy Family and The German Ideology, systematically expounding historical materialism. He also took part in reorganizing the Communist League and assisted in drafting the Communist Manifesto; his empirical orientation complemented Marx's more theory-bound approach.
Main career
Engels's scholarly contribution lay in extending historical materialism to nature, military affairs, and the family, and in serving throughout as Marx's supporter in both theory and material sustenance. His independently written Anti-Dühring, regarded as an encyclopedia of Marxism, systematically expounds philosophy, political economy, and scientific socialism. After Marx's death he spent years editing and publishing Volumes II and III of Capital, preserving the theoretical system from dispersal; he also studied military history and strategy and left related writings.
Legacy
Of the dialectical and historical materialism this book follows, Engels is an important expositor; his discussions of 'necessity and freedom', 'quantitative change into qualitative change', and 'negation of the negation' recur in the book's philosophical chapters. The Marx manuscripts he edited allowed the Capital system to be transmitted intact. The Communist Manifesto the two co-authored is itself one of the basic documents this book cites, and his popular expositions made Marxism more accessible to the public.
Personal life
He combined the roles of industrialist and theorist, long supporting Marx with the proceeds of business so that Marx could devote himself to writing. In later life he left commerce, settled in London, and concentrated on editing his late friend's manuscripts and writing his own late works. He died in London in August 1895; his manuscripts and scholarly enterprise were carried forward by later Marxists. He consistently and modestly attributed the credit to Marx.
Vladimir Lenin
Tier SForemost of this book's intellectual sources (with Marx)1870–1924
Vladimir Ilyich Lenin (birth surname Ulyanov) was born on 22 April 1870 in Simbirsk, Russia, into a progressive intelligentsia family. He developed Marxism into the theory and strategy of the era of imperialism, founded the Bolshevik Party, and led the October Revolution of 1917, establishing the world's first socialist state and inaugurating a new revolutionary model centred on Party-building, seizure of power, and construction. The Selected Works of Mao Zedong draws directly on Lenin for its discussions of the 'dictatorship of the proletariat', 'Party-building', 'theory of imperialism', and the 'national and colonial question', repeatedly calling his doctrine 'a universally applicable truth'. Lenin's writings on the new type of proletarian party, democratic centralism, and the vanguard deeply influenced this book's 'Party-building' theme; his judgements on imperialism as the highest stage of capitalism and on colonial and semi-colonial revolution provide this book's 'New Democracy' discourse with an international horizon. The 'Marxism-Leninism' this book names sets Marx's and Lenin's doctrines side by side as its two pillars, running through multiple themes.
- Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism analyses monopoly capitalism and is one of this book's methods for reading the international situation.
- His writings on the new type of proletarian party (democratic centralism, vanguard) deeply influenced this book's 'Party-building' theme.
- His ideas of 'national self-determination' and 'colonial and semi-colonial revolution' give this book's 'New Democracy' discourse an international horizon.
Family and origins
Lenin was born in 1870 in Simbirsk, Russia, into a progressive intelligentsia family; his father was a provincial education inspector, and the family valued education and public service and held a rich library that gave him a good early learning environment. As a youth he attended the local gymnasium with excellent results; stimulated by his elder brother Alexander's execution for revolutionary activity, he gradually turned toward Marxism and the revolutionary road. In 1887 he entered Kazan University's law faculty, but was soon arrested and exiled for student activism, interrupting his regular studies and setting him on the path of professional revolution; during exile he completed his university work by self-study. His brother's fate was a major spur to his radical politics and tinged the family with anti-autocratic colour. Simbirsk, on the Volga, blended provincial atmosphere with imperial bureaucracy, giving him both exposure to Russian official culture and some sense of the common people's plight; the orderly, studious home atmosphere laid the foundation for his later rigorous habits of thought.
Youth and education
In the 1890s he worked in Samara and St Petersburg on worker enlightenment and Party-building, translating and explaining Marx's Capital for Russian workers. Several times arrested and exiled to Siberia, during and after exile he systematically studied Marx and Engels and wrote The Development of Capitalism in Russia. He founded Iskra to unify the scattered Marxist circles and prepare a centralized, unified party; the paper became an important link among revolutionaries everywhere. This passage from provincial youth to professional revolutionary gave him both theoretical grounding and mastery of the art of underground organization; he excelled at turning abstract doctrine into concrete, workable programmes of action — a trait that ran through his later political career.
Entering the cause
At the 1903 Second Congress of the Russian Social Democratic Labour Party, the faction he led won a majority on the question of organization and was called the Bolsheviks, advocating a tight vanguard-party line. He then waged a long polemic with the Mensheviks, clarifying the idea of proletarian leadership in the bourgeois revolution. After the February Revolution of 1917 he returned to Russia and issued the April Theses, proposing the turn from the bourgeois-democratic revolution to the socialist revolution and laying the theoretical and political foundation for the October uprising. The Bolshevik-Menshevik split, on the surface a dispute over organizational principles, was in essence about who led the revolution and how; the vanguard line Lenin insisted on later became the blueprint for communist parties everywhere, and the line's divergence recurred repeatedly in the Party-building practice of many countries, a measure of its far-reaching influence.
Main career
In November 1917 (October by the Russian calendar) he led the armed uprising in Petrograd and established Soviet power; thereafter, amid civil war and construction, he practiced the idea of 'continuing the revolution under the dictatorship of the proletariat' and founded the Communist International to advance world revolution. His writings were voluminous, spanning philosophy, economics, and the theory of party and state; in his later years he also dictated texts on cooperatives and on reform of state organs. In the grim circumstances of civil war and foreign intervention he presided over War Communism and then the New Economic Policy to restore the economy; his writings on the state and revolution and on imperialism form an important part of twentieth-century revolutionary theory. This book cites at length his arguments on the Party, on imperialism, and on the state and revolution as a basis for analysing China and the world; his writings are an important source of this book's theoretical citations. He also set about rectifying the state apparatus, stressing the purity and discipline of the cadre corps — arguments later cited by this book as reference for Party-building and governance.
Legacy
Leninism is positioned by this book as 'Marxism of the era of imperialism and proletarian revolution'. His judgements on 'party', 'united front', and 'imperialism is a paper tiger' run through multiple themes. The revolutionary model he pioneered — centred on Party-building, seizure of power, and construction — profoundly influenced communist parties in the twentieth century and is an important reference for this book's revolutionary discourse. After his death his doctrine was summed up as Leninism, set alongside Marxism as the theoretical banner of communist parties everywhere; within the Soviet Union and the international communist movement it underwent continual reinterpretation and practice, and around the authority to interpret his legacy the Soviet and international movements repeatedly contended. The intra-Party struggle in the Soviet Union after his death also reflects the tensions Leninism met in practice.
Personal life
Equally a theorist and a practitioner, he wrote and organized prolifically even in exile and underground, known for rigorous logic and a sharp polemical style. In later life, as his health declined, he gradually withdrew from day-to-day leadership; the writings of that period — on cooperatives, on dialectics notes, and the like — are still cited by this book. He worked at a fierce pace, used to writing and reading late at night, and was known for a terse, forceful style; his speeches and articles are tightly logical and highly aggressive, often striking opponents at their weak point in debate. He died in January 1924 in Gorki, near Moscow, and was buried in Red Square; his death marked the Soviet Union's entry into a new leadership configuration, and Lenin's image has since been enshrined as the symbol of the revolutionary teacher. His habit of working late and his high self-discipline made him seem unusually energetic and resolute among his peers.
Joseph Stalin
Tier AIntellectual source and international reference1878–1953
Joseph Vissarionovich Stalin was born on 21 December 1878 in Gori, Georgia, an important leader of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union and the international communist movement. In discussing 'opposing dogmatism', 'criticism and self-criticism', and 'the historical experience of the CPSU(B)', this book repeatedly refers to the practice of the Soviet Union and the CPSU(B) as a reference for socialist construction. Some of his arguments on linguistics and on economic base and superstructure are also cited by this book, which both draws on Soviet experience and insists on independent judgement suited to China's concrete conditions. The History of the CPSU(B): Short Course, compiled by the CPSU(B) Central Committee, was also among the reference readings for this book's rectification study.
- Essays such as 'Reform Our Study' and 'Rectify the Party's Style of Work' use the history of the CPSU(B) as a mirror to oppose dogmatism within the Party.
- In discussing 'criticism and self-criticism', Soviet experience is cited to show this is the inner mechanism by which the Party stays vital.
- Some of his arguments on 'linguistics' and 'economic base and superstructure' are also cited by this book.
Family and origins
Stalin was born in 1878 in Gori, Georgia, into a poor artisan family and attended the Tiflis Theological Seminary, where he encountered underground Marxist publications. He joined the Russian Social Democratic Labour Party's underground activities early, organizing workers' groups and printing revolutionary leaflets. The seminary's strict training gave him diligent reading habits, while the ethnic and class contradictions of the Caucasus deepened his awareness of social injustice and shaped his later austere manner.
Youth and education
He came to prominence in the workers' movements of the Caucasus and Baku, was several times arrested and exiled to Siberia, yet repeatedly escaped and returned to revolutionary activity. Step by step he entered the Bolshevik central leadership, known for organizational and propaganda work and for writing for Party papers such as Pravda. By the time of the October Revolution he was already an important member handling nationality and organizational affairs; his underground experience built his standing.
Entering the cause
After the October Revolution he held posts such as People's Commissar for Nationalities and Central Secretary, coordinating grain, organization, and nationality affairs in the early civil war and state-building period. Thereafter his position in the Party's power structure kept rising, and he gradually became the principal leader of the CPSU(B) and the Soviet Union. The process was accompanied by repeated intra-Party line and personnel struggles; he ultimately prevailed in the succession after Lenin's death.
Main career
In power he pushed socialist industrialization and agricultural collectivization, led the Soviet Union through resisting and defeating fascist Germany's invasion, and made the USSR a great power in the postwar international order. This book views the Soviet Union as the pillar of the international proletariat and uses CPSU(B) experience as a mirror for its own construction and struggle. The History of the CPSU(B): Short Course, compiled by the CPSU(B) Central Committee, was also among the reference readings for this book's rectification study and widely influenced cadre education in communist parties everywhere.
Legacy
This book both draws on Soviet experience and maintains independent judgement, stressing 'taking the Soviet Union as a mirror' without blind imitation; its historical narrative of 'the struggle of two lines' influenced the book's political discourse. Stalin's writings and speeches were translated and introduced to China as material for cadres' theoretical study. His historical evaluation has long been contested within the international communist movement, and after the 20th Congress of the CPSU some of his policies were re-examined. Both the industrializing achievements of his rule and the harshness of its methods have been repeatedly scrutinized and debated by later historians.
Personal life
He long presided over the CPSU Central Secretariat, stressing organization, discipline, and propaganda, known for an austere manner, and liked to express policy in concise, programmatic language. Some of his articles on linguistics and philosophical questions were cited by this book as theoretical grounds. He died in Moscow in March 1953; his death triggered a recomposition of the Soviet leadership.